>>11592174
>Good players don't need the extra help though, bad players do.

NTA but that's literally how old game design work: you get rewarded by performing well and can kick even more ass when you do, it's an incentive to play well because playing well was the entire point. Like Gradius but tons and tons of games worked like that. Or Doom: when you start a new level you keep your stuff from the previous level but if you die you restart the current level without your stuff.

I haven't played X5 enough to comment though but ideally if the game wants to help bad players it should be in a way that isn't detrimental to good playing and which shouldn't encourage bad playing.

>Its similar in a way to the fantastic adaptive difficulty of RE4, where if you play bad, the game will get easier, and if you play good, the game will get harder.

I actually kinda dislike how the supplies system work, the way the less supplies you have the more likely enemies will drop something because in a way it punishes careful and conservative playing, which previous RE games were all about. Still, the way RE4 does it isn't NEARLY as bad as the way Silent Hill 3 does it. Now that's truly awful.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/vr/

Thread:

Do you prefer Classic or X?