>>11497752
>i'm not interested in having some extended argument over minute details between the games
is what i actually said
>I don't remember you
you're bad at this
>Never said that
you're awfully upset by my opinion
>Where was I console warring again? Examples
i'm not doing homework for someone arguing in bad faith. i could give a fuck about the console that RR64 came out on, i highly suspect you can't say the same thing
>Played it on release
cool. if you simply don't care for it, why are you being so whiny and argumentative? you clearly have some axe to grind. if you told me your favourite RR game i wouldn't be hounding you with demands about describing in detail why you think your game is better than mine. i wouldn't give a fuck

Back | Go to board

Board:

/vr/

Thread:

This game sucks. It came out a year after Type 4, yet it's got none of the style, has only three real tracks with slight variants and the…