>>55781991
>They broke the barely-new tradition with Johto
>Resume it in the next gen
>Brake it again in Paldea

It makes me a bit upset. I am not so fond of these pokemon but I wish I could see how fossil pokemon would've looked like in Johto and Paldea.

Also
>Rampardos, the Rock pokemon that evolved to have a strong head doesn't have Rock Head
>Archeops' Ability

Armaldo and Cradily should have Water Absorb imo (it makes sense).

The most interesting thing about fossil for me is how did they look like in the past.
>Many of them had a different typing, with the Rock type being added after reconstruction
>Aerodactyl apparently was different and its Mega is a glimpse of what he could've looked like
>Tyrantrum had more fur in the past
>Kabutops could've been Bug/Water due to them being based on anthropods
>Aurorus could've been Dragon/Ice
>The paldean fossils were incomplete and only reconstructed by mixing them with different fossils

Back | Go to board

Board:

/vp/

Thread:

Seeing as they're objectively the coolest subcategory of pokemon lets have a fossilmon thread.