>>55786552
>Because you specifically went out of your way to reply to me to explain your whole theory on for-sure predictions
It's not a theory.
>when I specifically never made one
Wrong, you wrote "It takes place during the founding if a major city that is already built in XY. It's in the past, just not the ancient past like OP thinks."
>I think you're probably autistic and lack the ability to differentiate between theorizing and predicting
There is nothing in "It takes place during the founding if a major city that is already built in XY. It's in the past, just not the ancient past like OP thinks." that says it's a theory or prediction.
In that sentence you are speaking as if those things are fact.
I think the real problem lies in the fact that English is probably not your first language and you're having trouble understanding words. I think that's fair, but no reason to insult people unwarranted.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/vp/

Thread:

>experimental sub-series set into the past to cover nations' historical events as took place in the Pokémon world before any Pokémon League,…