>>207745588
>why is the statue thing always brought up.
Well it's the only way to gain a frame of reference. Neither of us know for certain ehat is and isn't exaggerated, I just happen to believe this man was real and looked like that because I have seen men close to that big who aren't roiding and you certainly couldn't roid in the 4th century.

But it seems to me that anons like you have already decided if you're big you're on roids and it's that simple. I post Reg Park and am often told he was on roids despite him denying it his whole life and growing up impoverished in the 30's and 40's- roids are expensive now but were especially back in the 30's 40's in addition to being nearly impossible to get your hands on.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/tv/

Thread:

Is this physically possible?Also, are these muscles achievable natty?

Is this physically possible?
Also, are these muscles achievable natty?