>>33689341
You should also ask for the Nona/femanon demographics if possible.

>Latina, 34, unpopulated midwestern area.

>Are you most likely to reply to an intro based on its contents, the sender's profile, or both?

>What's the most important factor when deciding to reply to an intro?

For myself it was both. I went through look at the matches and went down by compatibility and number of answers to their questions. I thought the avoidant attachment style and the anxious attachment style was important enough to gander at if they had high numbers of questions answered. But if they had a low number I would look at their profiles if they were also looking for marriage or long term dating and some specific questions in the questionnaire that pops up first. If too many of those questions I looked up were not the same as mine I ignored them outright. Then finally distance. If they were more than an 8 hour drive away I’m likely not going to see them anyway.

>Does the sender's ability to hold a conversation matter more than the first message they send?
Yes. If the conversation is engaging enough then going to discord after 5 messages proven to be most successful.

>In your experience, are you more likely to have a good conversation with a >90% match?

Comparing to the people who eventually received my contact information and I’m still in contact with them after a month. They were all individuals that scored 80+ who are 27-36 years old. I am set up to physically date someone next week in person so we shall see if that is successful because he’s physically is closest to me. There are 2 others that I like but require a lot more planning to see. If they paid for my fare to see them I would have taken time off to see them but if it’s on my dime it’s planned vacation routes with super cheap fares near them so they will have to meet me near my trip destination.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/soc/

Thread:

/duo/ - Duolicious General #23: Very slightly less-bad gender ratio edition