>>16635971
You're falling for the trick.
>you assume reality can be fundamentally divided into 'observers' and 'nonobserver material'
>you assume reality isnt determined until observed
>you assume observation is a discrete event that occurs in a singular point in spacetime (somehow the act of observation bypasses the uncertainty principle in contradiction to the entire rest of copenhagenism)
>you assume observation only happens when an 'observer' in involved (eg. you hooked up the same experiments automatically with no human scientist and never 'checked' the results, the results would either not occur or would differ)
>you assume the effects of that observation only propagate at most as fast as light through spacetime (based on relativity)
>you assume logic and reasoning about events is a purely physical process that obeys light speed limitations when the 'subject' under consideration is some distance away from the 'center' of the 'observer'
The whole edifice rests on a shaky, marrow, scope-limited foundational set of metaphysical building blocks and assumptions

Video volume

Video muted

Loop video

Back | Go to board

Board:

/sci/

Thread:

So the uncertainty principle can cause the energies of different fields at any point to fluctuate randomly as long as it returns to zero in a tiny…