https://4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki
(More resources in replies)
Back | Go to board
Board: /sci/
"/sci/ - Science & Math" is 4chan's board for the discussion of science and math.
https://4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki
(More resources in replies)
discuss the practical implications of this discovery
https://spectrum.ieee.org/amp/earths-magnetic-field-2671519495
paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.15790
pic unrelated
>none of the girls actually look or dress like this
WHAT THE FUCK
Also giving a robot the kind of a child is a bad idea
>Or you can just look at the fucking line.
>Do NOT give advice
>Do NOT feed the nursoids
>Do NOT engage with premeds
And most importantly
>Do NOT respond to psych patients
https://gwern.net/doc/psychiatry/1995-hall.pdf
Also studied a bit of analog signal analysis which involved circuit analysis of transient signals, Fourier and Laplace transforms.
However I want to study these again more indepth to refresh and expand my knowledge, as well as have any of the calculus and other math background necessery to understand this at a deeper level, and further topics.
What textbook do you recommend /sci/?
Begins to research.
>Let's continue on to a PhD.
PhD.
>Feel that in your mind.
PhD.
>How does it feel to do a PhD?
PhD.
>Is there anything in your mind that wants to quit the PhD?
PhD.
>Do you get pleasure out of doing a PhD?
PhD.
>Are you well suited to doing a PhD?
PhD.
>Is there job security in doing a PhD?
PhD.
>Is there a sense of pride that comes with a PhD?
PhD.
>We're going to check references.
Citations.
>They were all evidenced at a time.
Citations.
>Millions and billions of them.
Citations.
>Did you ever read them?
Citations.
>Did you spend much time doing further research?
Citations.
>Have you ever been cited?
Citations.
>Do they ask you to cite them in return?
Citations.
>When you read a citation, do you check that they have interpreted the source correctly?
Citations.
Peer Reviewed.
>What's it like to receive a peer review?
Peer Reviewed.
>Do they teach you how to take constructive criticism?
Peer Reviewed.
>Do you long to receive a positive peer review?
Peer Reviewed.
>Do you dream about being peer reviewed?
Peer Reviewed.
>Have they left a note for you that you have ignored?
Peer Reviewed.
>What's it like to read your final draft?
Peer Reviewed.
What's it like to publish your study?
Peer Reviewed.
>Do you feel there is evidence that you are missing?
Peer Reviewed.
>Do you like to connect points of evidence?
Peer Reviewed.
>What happens when your reasoning is flawed?
Peer Reviewed.
>Have they made you feel stupid?
Peer Reviewed.
>Did you cite peer reviewer #2 when they asked you to?
Citations, Peer Reviewed within Citations.
>Why don't you say that three times?
Peer reviewed within citations.
Peer reviewed within citations.
Peer reviewed within citations.
With that being said do you think its possible to overcome any paradox by the simple addition of an extra dimension given that any statement can be stated in a 2 dimensional hierarchical space and as a consequence any complex polynomial with a contradiction is just misunderstood space the logic has tangled itself a higher dimensional space
>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_(computer_science)
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strange_loop
For example if the three laws were established and I had a gynoid and I want her to be my dominatrix. I hope this is the right board to ask this.
Previous Thread: >>16597487
This thread exists to ask questions regarding careers associated to STEM.
>Discussion on academia-based career progression
>Discussion on penetrating industry from academia
>Or anything in relation to STEM employment or development within STEM academia!
Resources for protecting yourself from academic marxists:
>https://www.thefire.org/ (US)
>https://www.jccf.ca/ (Canada)
Information resource:
>https://sciencecareergeneral.neocities.org/
>*The Chad author is seeking additional input to diversify the content into containing all STEM fields. Said author regularly views these /scg/ threads.
No anons have answered your question? Perhaps try posting it here:
>https://academia.stackexchange.com/
An archive of some of the previous editions of /scg/:
http://warosu.org/sci/thread/15740454
Previous thread: >>16584917
>what is /sqt/ for?
Questions regarding maths and science. Also homework.
>where do I go for advice?
>>>/sci/scg or >>>/adv/
>where do I go for other questions and requests?
>>>/wsr/ >>>/g/sqt >>>/diy/sqt etc.
>how do I post math symbols (Latex)?
rentry.org/sci-latex-v1
>a plain google search didn't return anything, is there anything else I should try before asking the question here?
scholar.google.com
>where can I search for proofs?
proofwiki.org
>where can I look up if the question has already been asked here?
warosu.org/sci
eientei.xyz/sci
>how do I optimize an image losslessly?
trimage.org
pnggauntlet.com
>how do I find the source of an image?
images.google.com
tineye.com
saucenao.com
iqdb.org
>where can I get:
>books?
libgen.rs
annas-archive.org
stitz-zeager.com
openstax.org
activecalculus.org
>articles?
sci-hub.st
>book recs?
sites.google.com/site/scienceandmathguide
4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki
math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivia/booklist.html
>online courses and lectures?
khanacademy.org
>charts?
imgur.com/a/pHfMGwE
imgur.com/a/ZZDVNk1
>tables, properties and material selection?
www.engineeringtoolbox.com
www.matweb.com
www.chemspider.com
Tips for asking questions here:
>avoid replying to yourself
>ask anonymously
>recheck the Latex before posting
>ignore shitpost replies
>avoid getting into arguments
>do not tell us where is it you came from
>do not mention how [other place] didn't answer your question so you're reposting it here
>if you need to ask for clarification fifteen times in a row, try to make the sequence easy to read through
>I'm not reading your handwriting
>I'm not flipping that sideways picture
>I'm not google translating your spanish
>don't ask to ask
>don't ask for a hint if you want a solution
>xyproblem.info
I wondered recently if the economics of US nuclear energy are distorted by purchasing surplus enriched uranium from Russia for decades? USG closed or privatized much of the domestic nuclear fuel enrichment.
Clearing your orbit is a stupid fucking criteria for being a planet. You're telling me if Mars were exactly the same but had large debris around it, it suddenly wouldn't qualify as a planet anymore? How do you even fucking quantify this, at what arbitrary line do we declare a certain amount of debris is too much. Holy shit they were right about Pluto
The basic idea of many worlds is that each time a quantum mechanical event happens, the universe splits so that there's a world where it turns out each of the ways it could have. So, for instance, if a particle can either go left or right, the world splits and there's one world where it goes left and another where it goes right. This may sound ridiculous and gerrymandered, but it allegedly falls straightforwardly out of existing physical equations rather than requiring an epicycle.
>to that end, it is best to reproduce with the most intelligent and wealthy women
>my own intelligence and wealth are not high
>but reproduction by force is an option
Game-theoretically speaking, how does one avoid the obvious conclusion?
Its the same for composite particles like protons, the internal particles are considered linked and subject to collective rules, but not the particles of two random protons on two different planets. They are just disconnected.
How does this work formally? When do multiple particles become "a system"?
When they become entangled?
What do you call billions of entangled particles? A condensate?
Previous thread is: >>16589624
Talk mathematics
Because it seems to me the only good explanation of consciousness without spiritual religious stuff is going to involve multiverses and the collapse of the wave function
1. Measuring a single entangled particle will directly effect the spin of the other regardless of distance
2. They're just synchronized so it just "appears" that they're interacting when measured
So which one is true?
I mean, everything seems to "age" with time, shouldn't that also include light?
This was 40 years ago.
What are the scientific implications of there not being a theory of physics with predictive power such as Heim?
Destroy it (by programmed function in the scanner)
Broadcast the information as a radio signal
Reconstitute yourself at the off-world target station
>cepstrum
These are actual terms
Lagrangian notation is superior in every way, if you have a single variable function you don't need to specify what variable you're taking the derivative of you just add a little ' on top of the function value and you're set. And when you have a multivariable function you can just (for example when taking derivative with respect to x of f(x,y)) write f_x(x,y). I have never understood why some people want to write so many fucking words when it can be done much more simply. Is it just to look more smart? I don't get it.
>its just a 15yo kid doing highschool math
how are indians impressed by this am i missing something or is this just a slightly above average 15yo
Do you have any thoughts about this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPMmLUpluu4
Is there any rule stopping a volume of less than an trillionth of an angstrom having 4 (or 5, or a million) spacial dimensions for a tiny amount of time and going back to 3 afterwards?
everyone who procrastinates understands that it's completely irrational. so then why is procrastination such a universal struggle?
do other intelligent species procrastinate as well?
Shit man, maybe it's better if I don't dig around in my shadow like I planned. I was diagnosed with schizophrenia maybe 12 years ago.
Evolution is the idea that extremely complex biological functions (that build upon eachother and rely upon eachother) came from random genetic mutations which appear in 0.01% of hosts and kill or deform the host 99.99% of the time.
Do I have that correct?
https://en.as.com/latest_news/scientists-discover-that-all-humans-come-from-the-same-mother-who-lived-200000-years-ago-in-botswana-n/
Evidently this isn't enough to create the singularity. AIs can't program better than we do, and program better AIs that are even better than themselves.
What will it take for this to be achieved?
Nowhere else in the universe does this happen.
say something nice about it
Current path:
>majoring in biomedical engineering (biophys focus) and software engineering
>after certification, start working as an assistant prosthetist
>masters for prosthetics and orthotics
>doctorate in neuroscience/neuroengineering
>surely at some point one of the three schools will produce research lab connections???
Those who know more than me, am i on the right path to make picrel real?
>inb4 it will be too hard you're crazy
Thank you but not this, not the question. :)
It’s wrong.
>but they found that-
No they didn’t.
>look at the evide-
Don’t need to.
Science has spoken.
Differences in Brain Development
People born blind have structural and functional changes in their brains, particularly in areas related to sensory processing and perception. These changes might provide resilience against the neural disruptions that contribute to schizophrenia.
Lack of Visual Hallucinations
Visual processing is a major factor in schizophrenia. Since congenitally blind individuals do not have visual experiences, they may be less susceptible to certain hallucination-related mechanisms.
Enhanced Social Processing
Blind individuals often develop strong social and verbal communication skills, which might protect against the social withdrawal and cognitive dysfunction associated with schizophrenia.
Reduced Dopamine Dysregulation
Schizophrenia is linked to excessive dopamine activity, particularly in the visual and cognitive regions. Since blind individuals process the world differently, their dopamine systems may be less prone to the disruptions that trigger psychosis.
why are these old 1950s/1960s government documentaries so sovlful?
https://www.forethought.org/research/preparing-for-the-intelligence-explosion
>Nooo that doesn't count you have to take the test only once!!!
Skill/performance is determined by consistency within the long run, maybe it's time to admit that IQ tests are bullshit if you think that practice is considered "cheating"
doesnt it make more sense to have this ability at birth? macaques take 3 years to sexually mature, thats way too long of a time
I accomplished nothing at the end of the day thanks to my goldfish attention span.
I want to know more about physics, but I don't have time to study a PhD.
phenylpiracetam
Can anyone give an unironic reason why we would ever need to know how to turn a sphere made up a self phasing material inside out?
If there is a med that you can take orally and will let you live 159 years, how come it wasn't discovered already?
----------
The assumption, "universality of specificity", provides the foundations necessary for our curiosities about consciousness.
----------
Our curiosities relate our existence to the existence of things, and therefore, our relatability is representative of the feeling of specificity of our curiosity. Existence of the notion of relatability universally represents aspects of specificity. On the other hand, existence of anything must relate to the notion of existence. Relatability of the notion of existence specifies aspects of universality. Let existential truth represent existence of the notion of existence and let existential curiosity represent existence of the notion of relatability. Existence of the notion of existence trivially relates the notion of existence to itself, and therefore must assume the existence of the notion of relatability. Existence of the notion of relatability must relate to the notion of existence. So, there is a existential truth-existential curiosity duality which we call existential duality.
Our relatability to existence of the notion of relatability is represents our feeling of existence of consciousness. Our relatability to existence of the notion of existence represents our feeling of our existence.
----------
Existential duality is foundational for the feeling of conscious existence. Our relatability to existential duality represents the feeling of our conscious existence and corresponds to the feeling of existence of consciousness relative to our consciousness.
----------
-Viśvāmitra
https://visvamitra.substack.com/
>What is this all about?
https://rentry.co/cr_general
>/sci/ anon found a way to safely and reliably activate Yamanaka factors, repairing your worn out body and reducing cellular age.
what I wanna know is, does this really do everything we need to fully restore ourselves? how long would that take? does this really address everything? seems like it addresses a lot of the problems people have on this board.
>We just need something that rebuilds the telomeres
Here ya go friend, just activate those Yamanaka factors https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3317569/
>Can't sleep
That’s a core benefit of the stack
>Still can't come up with a reliable solution for baldness
Allegedly its even growing new follicles back
>Protocol
It's a two step process.
Step1:
500mg Curcumin
500mg or so Tributryn
Take about a dropper full of B12.
Wait an hour.
Then, think of this as a balanced dose to start the reaction.
Step 2:
300mg Liposomal Apigenin
Another 500mg of Tributryn
About 500mg of either NAD or some combo of NAD and NMN.
Repeat step 2, 2-4+ times a day.
One week on one week off to avoid T cells exhaustion.
Ultimately this is your immune system first reprogramming itself and then going out to the rest of you. The T cells are able to identify cell wall markers where issues are the most severe and those will need to be targeted first before any specific issue.
Give it a little wiggle room if you don't need as much NAD or Tributryn. NAC is a good add in as well while doing this if you have a history of smoking or lung problems.
According to Calhoun, the death phase consisted of two stages: the "first death" and "second death." The former was characterized by the loss of purpose in life beyond mere existence — no desire to mate, raise young or establish a role within society.
What do you think, is it flat? Is it finite?
I've always imagined the universe as 3D-flat and finite, more or less spherical in shape, but expanding at the speed of light, so that one could never reach the outer boundary, like a bubble that grows infinitely larger.
And why are young women outperforming men?
Pros:
-(Theoretically) no 6-year-olds going to kindergarten with kids who just turned 5
-More-or-less solves birthday cutoff dilemmas
-Not having to wait nearly a year for another school vacation longer than a week
-Not being stuck with a shitty teacher for an entire year of elementary school
-If behind, easier to catch up over a school break
then we compare their genes and see that insects end up quite far from the fish forming entirely different branch
ceiling of 159
.9 correlation with g on a small high range sample
https://rqvt-iq.anvil.app/
What if the universe is a hypersphere—a 3D surface of a 4D object?
That part isn’t new, cosmologists already talk about that.
But here’s the twist:
What if there are many hyperspheres—adjacent to each other, like bubbles in some higher-dimensional space—and each one has its own rules of reality?
Different physics. Different logic.
Maybe in one universe 1+1=3, and it makes sense there.
Maybe that’s what the multiverse actually is: not parallel timelines, but adjacent logical realities, wrapped into hyperspheres.
Now take it a step further:
What if those hyperspheres aren’t the top level?
What if they’re just the protons and neutrons of something even bigger?
Like, they form atoms in a higher-scale dimension we can’t perceive.
Maybe they interact to form matter in a realm beyond anything we can experience.
Maybe our entire universe is just a tiny part of a meta-molecule floating in something else's bloodstream.
And maybe the weirdness of quantum mechanics—nonlocality, entanglement, randomness—is actually just spillover from the structure of that higher-level physics.
If the universe is infinite couldn't we follow stars back to the origin/point of the big bang? For example if our star is 13 billion years old, but a distant star is 12 billion years old wouldn't that indicate the direction the big bang came from?
And if we were to survive for billions of years wouldn't we eventually need to follow the "wave" finding younger and younger stars so we're not in complete darkness?