>>16594538
>Most likely the information about humans who lived in the distant past has been permanently erased by various processes.
>>16594713
>I'm gonna guess no because of information loss
information doesn't get lost, just scrambled.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-hiding_theorem
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/will-the-universe-remember-us-after-were-gone/
>I estimate that there are roughly 10^11 bits of information to fully specify a human mind
that's 12.5GB. made an estimate considering the nr of neurons and some trillion axons with weights for them and it came out somewhere around 35TB. I've seen other estimates between 30-200TB.
out of these a lot are standard functions of the brain. just the identity bit that encodes lived (and encoded) experiences should be way lower, maybe under 1TB.
but the issue is with extracting the information from the environment. which seem insane, compute wise. with current tech. but that doesn't mean it won't be possible in some future, somehow, new tech/science whatever
>>16594713
>also I don't believe in the clone = equal to the original thing
it's not about belief tho.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/sci/

Thread:

Resurrecting all humans ever lived as a technical problem