>>16539880
>but there are coherent models of the universe
>there are no non-trivial coherent models of experience
pro-tip

the models of the universe you are so endeared with, first off aren't actually very good and that's why we had to deal with two decades of "dark energy" scammers trying to make the data fit the "model", and second are actually just models of human experience of the cosmos

you aren't getting away from this by handwaving about "matter"

>neurons exist. no evidence for consciousness
the word "neuron" represents an idea
"matter" is an idea

there is more direct evidence for consciousness than matter because it is through consciousness that we are even aware of matter as a concept
seriously how are you this dense unless everything >>16539342 is completely accurate and you are suffering from terminal cognitive dissonance

Back | Go to board

Board:

/sci/

Thread:

Is eliminative materialism shit? I just can't seem to understand how any could possibly buy into that bullshit. It seems like a dogmatic attempt…