>>16533067
It's totally irrelevant, mathematically covering the entire earth in trees isn't enough. Spamming about something that doesn't work is just a distraction.

>>16533072
>According to (you) it "doesnt work" despite evidence to the contrary.
Feel free to calculate the area of new forests that's needed to offset just the current emissions, let alone to start to turn back the clock. This is a simple back off the napkin calculation you surely can do?
Then please note the areas of the world where you would put these new forests that wouldn't include farms because "youd have to let people starve" if you replace crops with trees.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/sci/

Thread:

burn charcoal, make carbon dioxide, trees breathe it in, make charcoal out of the trees, repeat.What's wrong with this solution? Loads of…

burn charcoal, make carbon dioxide, trees breathe it in, make charcoal out of the trees, repeat.
What's wrong with this solution? Loads of…