>>16524135
>bbbut this paper
just look what faggot /pol/ OP left out.
what a suprise.

>https://doi.org/10.4236/acs.2024.144025
>https://www.scirp.org/pdf/acs2024144_44701276.pdf (same paper)

>Basic physics combined with measurements and data taken from the literature allow us to conclude that CO2 induced infrared back-radiation must follow an asymptotic logarithmic-like behavior, which is also widely accepted in the climate-change community.
>The important question of climate sensitivity by doubling current CO2 concentrations is estimated to be below 1˚C.

as the author also points out in the abstract, this is not a new insight at all.
I am sure that if the asymptotic course of the proportion of the rebound should ever deviate surprisingly from the course of all previous measurements, we will let you know.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/sci/

Thread:

Absorption limits for CO2