>>16538052
>>3/3=0
>lmao this is the level of the science board
Yet, you will happily say that 0!=1 simply because it's convention. Not because it makes any logical sense.
There's definitely a trend going on there that you dismissed away with one typo.

>>16538032
Here is an expansion of your list -

0-0 =0
0+0 =0
0/0 =0 (undefined)
0x0 =0
0^0 =0 (undefined), 1 often given as result
0! =0 (undefined), 1 often given as result
0root0 =0 (undefined), other results are given
7 same answers

1-1 =0
1+1 =2
1/1 =1
1x1 =1
1^1 =1
1! =1
1root1 =1
5 same answers

2-2 =0
2+2 =4
2/2 =1
2x2 =4
2^2 =4
2! =2
2root2 =1.414.. etc
3 same answers

3-3 =0
3+3 =6
3/3 =1
3x3 =9
3^3 =27
3! =6
3root3 =1.442.. etc
2 same answers

4-4 =0
4+4 =8
4/4 =1
4x4 =16
4^4 =256
4! =24
4root4 =1.414.. etc
0 same answers

So yeah, self-operations with the same answers decrease as the size of the natural number increases from 0 to 3.
From 4 and above no natural numbers display that property.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/sci/

Thread:

>2+2=4>2x2=4is this coincidence or is there a deeper meaning to this?

>2+2=4
>2x2=4
is this coincidence or is there a deeper meaning to this?