>>16141144
From your source
>Finally, Earth is currently in an interglacial period (a period of milder climate between Ice Ages). If there were no human influences on climate, scientists say Earth’s current orbital positions within the Milankovitch cycles predict our planet should be cooling, not warming, continuing a long-term cooling trend that began 6,000 years ago.
This, then, is logically held up as the desirable end-goal of climate death cultists. Because net zero isn't enough for them. Nothing has ever been enough. No, they're all talking about terraforming via carbon sequestration to return CO2 to it's "natural" level which has been hovering just above the death zone of 150ppm for the last few millions of years.

But there's nothing good about the glaciers advancing again and all of North America, much of Europe and Northern Asia being covered in glaciers again. You want to talk about disruptions to our way of life?
Carbon emission by humans is a good thing. We've ensured that the planet won't die by naturally sequestering too much carbon out of the air and we've ensured that things will stay, globally, on average, at a temperature much better suited to human life.
Remember, humans are a tropical species. There's only a very small part of the Earth, in and around the equator, where we can survive "naturally" without clothing. It was clothing but more importantly, fire, that let us leave the tropics. It is not without reason or irony that the output of fire, CO2, is the idol of the death cult.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/sci/

Thread:

Climate scientist Stephen Schneider of NOAA in the October 1989 issue of Discover magazine admitted that climate scientists intentionally mislead the…