>>4394992
>i am smart I AM SMART I AM SMART, I AM SMART ENOUGH TO GET IT, I AM LIKE THE HIGH CULTURE PEOPLE!
Thats all you can say but you’re not smart enough to realize that art is subjective and subjectively there is nothing you need to understand about slacktivist photography like burtynsky other than that he needs to tell you that he’s an environmentalist. Yes, that is all it is. Then disagree and say you think it’s boring photos of a normally progressing earth and bust out your up of tea (make sure you dont spit it out when you’re accused of having no soul by a pallid trust fund kid). The rants about liminal metaphoric narratives are nothing more than advertising targeted at a demographic of 110 IQ white kids with rich parents. They can be applied to ANYTHING, even fe2fuckers photos taken as jokes.
>but his intent was…
French writers already understood the great scam of intent before you were born. What use is intent? None.

This is not art. If it were portraiture it would be generic shots of skinny africans. You have never seen an untold story revealed in your life. You have never seen subjectivity in photography run deeper than is normal for an image with commentary.

This faggot is just incel adams. Well executed photo of land feature taken from a slightly unusual position. Next?

Back | Go to board

Board:

/p/

Thread:

How do I make my photos postmodern?