>>4376188
>f/64's "objective" cancer
I do have to defend that group because their objective was pure sharp focus but not necessarily "objective" or palpable reality (other than Dorothea Lange's efforts at photojournalism) they often played with the illusion of whimsical settings that made you question the reality itself of it or so to say, Adams was notorious for shopping the light and shadows to create this effect, he never hid that fact.
Their group merely meant to distance itself from pictorial trends because they said that genre focused and mixed a lot of painting and graphic hand artistry rather than pure photography, which is ironic because Adams practically used dodge & burn methods like a graphic designer would.

Also butthurt jannitoids can't break my spirit, suck it and deal with the wrongthink, bunch of shit-eating pajeet homos

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Camera Software	Picasa
Photographer	Picasa

Image-Specific Properties:

Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2013:09:23 17:09:04
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1500
Image Height	1182
Unique Image ID	e3c11f9d0b0bc717bbeaafb4e0381873

Back | Go to board

Board:

/p/

Thread:

How the fuck he did it bros? HOOOOOOOW For me Edward S Curtis is an absolute towering mammoth of 20th century American photography. What a fucking…

How the fuck he did it bros? HOOOOOOOW
For me Edward S Curtis is an absolute towering mammoth of 20th century American photography. What a fucking…