>>4306474
all of them promote AI shit and even offer creation services, it's a fucking waste of time for photographers, especially since there are still such high requirements for anything photography to get accepted
>had an abandoned soviet era swimming pool's diving board image rejected over 'intellectual property' despite the ussr having collapsed 40 years ago
>adobe stock rejected a simple photograph of trees in fog over 'quality issues'
doesn't help that shit like unsplash exists for photographers to get good boy points in the form of views and likes while offering everything for free

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
Camera Software	Capture One Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	127 mm

Image-Specific Properties:

Horizontal Resolution	1000 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1000 dpi
Exposure Time	1/4000 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Brightness	11.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	85.00 mm
Image Width	5000
Image Height	3333
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Soft
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Soft

Back | Go to board

Board:

/p/

Thread:

Does anyone still do microstock as a side hustle?