>Everything looks shit over 1600
>Even 400 is pushing it
You guys either have ridiculously high standards, in which case I hope you only ever shoot at 100 on the latest and greatest full frame on a tripod stopped down to the optimum aperture, or you're using decade old crop bodies. You need to stop caring so much. I have no qualms going up to even 12800 if I need to, most situations are 6400 and below so I don't care at all.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7RM3
Camera Software	ILCE-7RM3 v3.10
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	55 mm

Image-Specific Properties:

Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2024:03:24 12:46:31
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	2000
Brightness	-0.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	3238
Image Height	2160
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

Back | Go to board

Board:

/p/

Thread:

Is a nifty fifty necessary and a good second lens? Good telephotos have priced me out so that leaves something like pic related that is remote…