>>27608916
>touchscreen
No feedback, controls nestled several menus deep, have to look at screen each time to find, select, and adjust option. Lots of time spent looking at screen.
>physical controls
Find it at a glance, then operate it without looking at it any further. Minimal time looking at controls, often literally no time.
>OP
A humongous disingenuous faggot, as always.

>>27609048
>constant high illumination, high contrast, blue computer screen lighting sticks its dick in the driver's eyes all the way to the balls after they already spent 16 hours 2 inches away from a phone screen
>attempt to compensate with NiggerNova 9000™ headlights with automatic (read: always on) high beams blinding everyone ahead so now even the people who had the sense to operate a vehicle actually fit for human use can't see either
There shouldn't be any touchscreens in cars, anywhere. They are inferior, unsafe, and only used because "muh production costs" because it's $0.001 cheaper per car to integrate everything into a touchscreen than produce physical controls, nevermind that the kike homunculi bean counters raised the price $10,000 anyway.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/o/

Thread:

>watch some video about how touchscreen are bad>retard was trying to adjust side mirrors while driving the car>says you can adjust…

>watch some video about how touchscreen are bad
>retard was trying to adjust side mirrors while driving the car
>says you can adjust…