>>1373113
>abused to erode trust and silence dissenting opinions.
Feacesbook had any level of trust? I mean to any but the most gullible of the simpletons.
As for the 'silencing dissenting opinions' when 90%+ is blatently false and one of the precursor conditions for using docile media is an inability to think for themselves it did serve a useful function.
Now you'll get to see what it's like without it. It was hard enough to get you dumb fucks to acknowledge easily observable phenonema like evolution before. Enjoy all the flat earthers and other such buttfuckery that'll flood it.

>>1373131
>I deleted my account years ago.
Bwahaahaaahaa. Oh. You was serious? BWAHAAAHAAAHAAAHAAAHAAAHAAA.

Think about that for a second. Thats their revenue stream, the data you've been stupid enough to allow them to rape. Why would they allow you to delete their income?

Mark it so you don't get to see it no more, sure. All day long. But that's not the same as deleted now, is it? Did you even bother to consider what uses they will find for this data later? Or did you just shovel it in there with no reagrd?

Back | Go to board

Board:

/news/

Thread:

Meta firing all the fake checkers