>>24309239
>you invented an easy stereotype whole cloth
>who craft their bird-brained banalities while sitting on the fucking toilet
well, you contributed, so no, it was not an invention but seems to have struck a chord
although I do apologise as it seems Twitter still boasts more such personalities than Bluesky - my fault really for overestimating the actual user traffic of the latter

>not a single solitary soul in this entire thread brought up
irrelevant; just because it wasn't brought up previously in the thread doesn't mean it's a strawman

>equating the ramblings of “random negresses ranting incoherently on Bluesky about muh patriarchy” who craft their bird-brained banalities while sitting on the fucking toilet vs. a soon-to-be published author who runs one of the world’s most successful substacks and has a professional relationship with one the most prestigious publishers on earth is the textbook definition of a FALSE EQUIVALENCY
the equivalency is in their subject material; both write about feminism and perceived oppression on the Internet, what's false about that?

you misread and thought I was saying that these deliver the same quality, when the very crux of what I was writing was contrasting that quality
so no, not false at all

you're not as clever as you think you are :)

Video volume

Video muted

Loop video

Back | Go to board

Board:

/lit/

Thread:

word on the street is Knopf’s advance for Rayne Fisher-Quan’s hotly anticipated essay collection, COMPLEX FEMALE CHARACTER, was well within the $500k…