>>24094798
>#Bookstagram
Speaking about their poetic current (instapoetry), it's very hit or miss.
The subtleties are not formally explicit, like in the proverbial iambic pentameter, so it attracts a lot of superficial reader, while at the same time it filters a lot of superficial critics.
The same can be said about #BookTok.
>#BookTok
The series that get (really) famous should be the tetragones of any moid who desires to be well versed in the understanding of the female psyche. As I already said in a different setting, romance exegesis mogs biblical exegesis.
>#BookTube
Easily accessible, varied, in-depth analysis of every facet of the literature market? It has two downsides: it is governed mainly by women (this makes the videos pretty ephemeral in their content) and it is never more than a summary of bigger literary pieces.
I would really wanna see a female Pyrocynical going through the Empyrean series.
>/lit/
An extremely formalist setting that prevents the discussion of contemporary literature, but at the same time provides a good base level education to enjoy all the other communities.

I would start with /lit/, move to #BookTube, then #BookTok, then #Bookstagram, then back to #BookTube and /lit/, since they give the best spot to learn about (YouTube) and discuss (/lit/, I don't have Reddit) literature.
That said, since Instagram is the best place for poetry, and poetry is the finest of arts, then #Bookstagram is indeed the highest form of avant-garde literary expression at the moment.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/lit/

Thread:

Are #Bookstagram #BookTok or #BookTube better than /lit/?