>>23981860
>I reply to offtopic shenanigans mentioned in >>23977398 (its le capitalism)
>Mention how it is indeed superficial and that I wish dworkin and co would talk about this inherent drive found in women to consume rough sex content >>23980693
>That isn't verifiable and it doesn't mean anything because what porn users watch doesn't show what genders find sexually attractive >>23981651
Funny how you gotta ignore this then btw
>the fact that the society they grew up in has trained them since childhood to be narcissistic psychopaths who believe it's "normal" to watch porn and "normal" for women to get raped in the throat, anus, and vagina on camera "because they're getting paid." This whole society is fucking disgusting and retarded, but again, I didn't need to read a book to tell me that.>>23977398

Anyway, to continue.
>I say how it is verifiable and how you can see this desire on female behalf in other facets of life. >>23981764
>>>23981799
>Uhmm okay it exists but you are wrong
The convo ended there desu, we are just going in circles, as I predicted.
>>23981860
>No U are diverting
And then here is the projecting as a last effort pilpul attempt.
So once again, you may believe what you want, if you ignore the data and trends and female behavior online and irl. I don't know why you gotta be so angry about being told otherwise though.
Pssht, accusing others of diverting when this convo started with a diversion
>I NEEED to talk about capitalism in a thread about dworkin's critique on porno and porn users
Laughable.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/lit/

Thread:

What's your opinion of Dworkin's critique of pornography?