>>39101755
>which serves no benefit as alternative perspectives often further things like art and such on that level of human existence
Art doesn't matter to most people, they're happy with AI art. Plus, for things that can't be done by it yet, people don't like "pandering" and other stuff that is not about the average person, so I don't think that alternative perspectives will be missed. People already think that people who think outside of the box and such are more prone to troon/poon out, so getting rid of them will be seen as an overall good thing because it would prevent the fall of civilization.
>It'd literally just be a waste of time and harder to implement than getting rid of people like that other ways.
I guess that's true, although killing them off normally would also require a lot of effort.
>The answer to both of these is no, as it's not a pressing issue in any sense of the words.
It is if you manage to convince people that civilization is falling and that's the only way to prevent mass cannibalism and pedophilia and so on. I guess that would require a lot of propaganda though.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/lgbt/

Thread:

/femrepgen/Letting the thread die every time I go to sleep edition