>>63529618
>Norktards already assume NK is producing more 152/122 than NATO (155/105)
NATO countries don't make 155mm or 122mm artillery shells at all as far as I know, so they are producing more 152mm and 122mm shells than NATO is. I think you were trying to say that it's idiotic to believe that the DPRK is producing more artillery shells than NATO is generally, I think it is possible that the DPRK produces more shells than NATO countries do, but I think there isn't enough data to say for certain.
>Your "unlikely" is unnecessary when your stupidity will be interpreted under the Poe's Law criteria.
You seem to be under the impression that you are very smart and that people who disagree with you don't have good reasons for believing what they do. I remember what that was like because I also used to be 15. That was a long time ago though, so I've got the emotional distance to be sympathetic but slightly embarrassed by the ways you remind me of myself back when I was younger.
>You just have to see the sustained artillery use of Russia
Aside from the problems with using just Russian artillery use to make conclusions about North Korean shell production, I actually haven't seen good data on Russian artillery use. If you have some sort of open source intel that has found a good way of tracking how many shells Russia fires daily, I'd love to see it.

Video volume

Video muted

Loop video

Back | Go to board

Board:

/k/

Thread:

So this is the power of American industry.No wonder NATO can't keep Ukraine supplied with basic things like artillery shells.This is…

So this is the power of American industry.
No wonder NATO can't keep Ukraine supplied with basic things like artillery shells.
This is…