>>61447266
>>61447424
>bomb at will. Imagine if all countries had nuclear ICBMs
A few nukes aren't particularly effect, they aren't even capable of stopping an armored assault due to how resistant tanks are to the blast effects and their NBC systems(ie just filters and overpressure really). Everybody having nukes wouldn't change much in their benefit it would just mean that if they piss of the big boys they now get nuked since they have nukes and they are fair game.

I'm fine with it but it gives you little for what you get. Note that against Murica it doesn't matter as some a dozen shitty ICBMs which are likely to be jumped up R-7s which take hours to fuel, because mudmen cannot into space, are unlikley to scare anybody.

Also I wish we had an actual genocidal white nationalist empire. If that were the case we'd be so spread out and cities so valueless other than as ports that we wouldn't care about taking nuke. And it wouldn't change our policy of "murder everybody a shade darker than milk and take their land" anyway.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/k/

Thread:

Why isn't every small nation bum-rushing nuclear weapons development?