>>7141774
>The age of the artist making a living off consumerism is dead.
Your post is mostly gold, but I disagree with this point—if by "consumerism" you mean making bank from your art. Putting your "soul" or "way" into your art is a value-add—it's what will distinguish you from the waves of AI-slop.
>We must follow the footsteps of Picasso and Andy Warhol
Not sure Warhol is the best example since he embraced mechanistic modes of production (he ran a factory and used existing photos, which got him into copyright trouble). He would've probably embraced AI.
Picasso and other modernists are a better example. Though they're hated here, when you look at them in the context of history and the threat of technology they faced, their turn towards radical expression and experimentation makes perfect sense.
But also note that most of those modernists were mega-rich from their art, which negates your earlier point about "consumerism."
>Anyways, what do you guys think are works you believe can't ever be replicated by AI?
Anything that is deeply reflective of personal experience/psychology. But I don't think we've seen the last of "skill." If anything there will likely be a return to skilled art in traditional mediums (I've already seen this on YouTube, with more videos on traditionally inked comics etc.).
But the reaction to AI can go in any number of paths. I think it'll become obvious how important the parasocial aspect of art is, that most humans want to enjoy art by other humans. Expect more process videos, streams, performances (like KJG), etc.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/ic/

Thread:

I'm ready to accept it. But I'm angry at god, or whoever runs this shit.