>>17614664
>The Harappan language is not directly attested and its affiliation is uncertain since the Indus script is still undeciphered

>There is no archaeological evidence of a southward migration through the Deccan after the end of the urban phase of the Indus-Sarasvati civilization. More than a millennium passed between post-Harappa and civilizations forming the South

>The early Dravidians don't have the Harappan script, they don't have Harappan crops, they don't have Harappan civil engineering and architectural styles, they don't have characteristic Harappan religious figures, they don't have Harappan musical instruments, they don't have large volumes of IVC sources goods. There isn't cultural continuity between the Dravidians and the Harappans

>The earliest Harappan settlement, Mehrgarh, was part of the Near Eastern Neolithic, with similarities between "domesticated wheat varieties, early phases of farming, pottery, other archaeological artefacts, domesticated plants and herd animals."

>Ancestral North Indians (ANI), who are related to Middle Easterners

>the ancestral ASI may have spoken a Dravidian language

Video volume

Video muted

Loop video

Back | Go to board

Board:

/his/

Thread:

Is it fair to say that indians are the progenitors of civilization? Without indians we'd still be living in mud huts.