>>17415717
>There are foundational statements that any conscious agent couldn’t deny
prove it
>one of them is existence is and it is objectively true.
how can you prove that existence is and that it is objectively true? IT all just ends up being a baseless assumption. A "given".
>Yes it is more loving for a killer to let a family know they did it then leaving them in ignorance?
I don't think the killer loves the men whose families he killed. I think he gains a sadistic pleasure from knowing that they know that he did it. I do not see how this is "loving".
>If love is to have any meaning in an eternal context the only definition Is the desire for the object of your love to know eternal truth
This is meaningless drivel.
>Heaven doesn’t mean no suffering?
Aquinas disagrees with you.
define "meaningless suffering.
>You will always suffer being limited in the face of god and all the ignorance that entail in an eternally novel existence
Again, Aquinas and most other church fathers disagree with you because they believe that with the beatific vision, when you witness God's glory, all the mysteries of the world will be laid bare for you and everything will make sense and you will understand that it is all good.
>You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding if you think a heaven without free will is heaven
Ironic, since you apperantly don't know anything about the religion you claim to practice. Probably because you only entered the church out of hopes of getting a virginal gf, like virtually all the tradlarpers.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/his/

Thread:

Why does God HAVE to be "good" or "pure love" instead of pure hate?>because He is perfectI have yet to see an actual…

Why does God HAVE to be "good" or "pure love" instead of pure hate?
>because He is perfect
I have yet to see an actual…