>>16542203
>It was entirely based on Grammar, modern spoken Hebrew is beyond a different language than liturgical hebrew
In as much as Modern English is far more analytic and has evolved analytic grammatical structures, sure, but that's what happened to literally every Semitic language, and outside of Semitic it also happened in Coptic. I'm not sure why you keep insisting that Modern Hebrew is based off of Yiddish, it's patently not (Yiddish doesn't have a construct form or fusional tense, and it's dual-number is just an importation from Hebrew anyways). Like, do some basic research on this, the revival of Hebrew was done by taking the liturgical and scholastic usage of Hebrew, the living Hebrew-Arabic creole that the Mizrahim spoke, and the Hebrew trade language, and mashing them together and stringing the results up according to the grammatical structures of other similarly analytic sister languages.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/his/

Thread:

>is under british rule. speaks irish.>gets free of british rule. no longer speaks irish.what did they mean by this?

>is under british rule. speaks irish.
>gets free of british rule. no longer speaks irish.
what did they mean by this?