>>104874426
> Are there any drawbacks to using pic related for full disk encryption on Windows?
apart from bricking itself after an update, it also slow. not recommended unless you're extremely schizo. better to just encrypt non-system partitions.

>>104874835
not how it works, computer illiterate simpleton

>>104875254
and this. if faggots want a proper encrypted operating system that won't brick after an update, linux is your only solution.
>unlike bitlocker
bitlocker has its own host of problems and vulnerabilities that make it untrustworthy on various hardware configurations. it's continuously exploited (successfully) with volume keys extracted without too much effort. for example:
>"This paper presents a forensic method for obtaining the BitLocker Volume Master Key (VMK) from TPM-protected evidence using Intel DCI technology and reverse engineering techniques. It shows how to enable Intel DCI in the firmware, reverse the Windows Boot Manager UEFI application, and debug the target computer using a USB 3 A–A cable to retrieve the VMK from memory. "
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266628172300015X

Video volume

Video muted

Loop video

Back | Go to board

Board:

/g/

Thread:

Are there any drawbacks to using pic related for full disk encryption on Windows? I'm using Bitlocker right now but after finding out how easy it…