>>104437345
>When it interfaces with C code
I'm refraining of calling you names, but let's think with me for a second.
both, the answer is both.
the thing is that it's _impossible_ to guarantee code "safety" the way rust does. redox os' kernel, which is 100% rust, has extensive use of unsafe. too extensive, in fact
>b-but you isolate the unsafe parts and build safe layers on top of it
can you provably verify the unsafe parts are correct? your safe abstraction is only as safe as the unsafe layer under it. all of this effort to shove rust into the linux kernel, only to achieve literally 0 improvement for the reason I explained above, is why everyone is against it

Back | Go to board

Board:

/g/

Thread:

>Promotes Rust in your Linux kernelThat is gonna be one repulsive troon /g/uysI know you were thinking it too

>Promotes Rust in your Linux kernel
That is gonna be one repulsive troon /g/uys
I know you were thinking it too