>>100127958
Things I like about fedora that are hard to find in other distros:
> Funding secured(RHEL funds it 100%)
> As long as there is group interest you can make a SIG and provide what you want under fedora.
> It's actually well organized with modern website frontends(discuss, hyprkitty)
> Generally Redhat keeps their hands off(RHEL cares about servers and enterprise, most packages from fedora do not even touch RHEL, or frankly about gaming/desktop for that matter)
> Goals are well laid out. With proper discussion threads and summaries.
> Copr is a neat alternative to ubuntu ppas. Has integration to discuss which is neat.
> New packages, new kernels, new design ideas(arch can't push users as much like with the last one because its far more customizable)
> Both Rolling and Release based
> It can actually update itself to a new release with a graphical tool(which a lot of linux distros struggle with, see Debian)
> Cool experiments like silverblue

Things fedora that need work:
> Wiki, its just not as good as the things they have on Arch and Gentoo(Gentoo is the best one)
> I think the focus should shift to KDE, discussed it with some people in the project too.

Problems:
> RedHat/IBM

I like fedora, i don't like how redhat has been behaving.

>>100128867
firmware. Enough to get you running.(networking, printers, microcode)
the rest of the firmware and proprietary programs are in rpmfusion which is not part of the fedora project for obvious legal reasons.

In that regard you could say that standard Debian 12 and Fedora install are just as proprietary.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/g/

Thread:

Are Red Hat / Fedora users actually brain damaged? Why do they constantly suck the cock of IBM and support software that is not free?