>>978777
>NYT case hasnt even come to its conclusion

Realization about the tech that underpin this. Outcome of the NYT case is irrelevant except in the margins.
The fact that we know how to build minds that can conduct these type of tasks doesn't go away due to copyright.

A system that can behold the visual field and categorize elements in images based on what's present in them has been realized.
If you try to hamstring this system by regulating what it is allowed to view by requesting machines don't look at anything that exist on the public internet
you need to invent laws that doesn't exist as of yet, but even if you do you've just succeeded in snatching the advantage from OpenAI and handed it to google.

Google already owns youtube and google earth and webcrawlers that have aggregated data on who knows what and already have all the training data they need.
You've forced other companies in the AI space to play catch up filming the whole world, a task that is already achieved for the competitor
who now owns the public internet as it exist.

So if you pop champagne if the NYT lawsuit goes thru and succeeds in dealing crippling damage to OpenAI all you celebrate
is how you snatched the lightsaber from Luke Skywalker and handed it to Darth Vader. That's my angle.

Overall the genie is out of the bottle, question now is who's bidding it will ultimately perform.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/3/

Thread:

just when you thought it's over, it gets even more over than you can ever imagine