>>16157442
>quantum effects to atoms only
when you strip the quantum effects from atoms everything makes sense:
>Magnetism
in certain compositions of atoms (which do have an internal structure) the surface atoms are all of a similar positive ir negative charge (its not 'the momentum of electrons' lol), they pull and push on other specific atom compositions (because atoms interact with each other more deeply than through the orbiters).
>photoelectric effect
>be high energy interaction (hadron being thrown at an atom)
>emit waves
>wave gets to an atom in a body
>hello atom, may i pass through
>no nigger
>disturbation manifasts as mass because it cant pass through
>stupid high mass, high charge new orbiter
>panic
>gtfo nigger
>atom bounces an orbiter into your eyeballs
new orbiter = instability = change (light ruining things)

>planck's law
>it is just equations on continuous emissions of waves
why would that be hard to extrapolate...
>quantization of energy is necessary
what do you even mean by that?

Back | Go to board

Board:

/sci/

Thread:

If 85% of the universe needs to be composed of dark matter for general relativity to work the way it does, isn't it simpler to conclude that…