Board: /sci/
"/sci/ - Science & Math" is 4chan's board for the discussion of science and math.
The new /sci/ wiki
https://4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki
(More resources in replies) What's the purpose of taking the supremum of the infimum here in equation A1.5? This is apparently supposed to extend arithmetic to infinite decimals.
(D is the set of finite decimals) >consciousness is caused by brain activity, there is no afterlife
>diseases are caused by bad air, there are no microscopic organisms What caused the emergence of human races? >take philosophy of science class
>the high IQ STEMchuds are straight up laughing at what the philosophy teacher says half the time.
Brutal. the 3 limitations are uncertainty, volatility or lack of sane reward or safety for work done or asset acquired, and chaos or competition or understood and known evils and problems
there isn't a good word because the distinctions are pretty complicated between the three still pretty unique tiers of limitations
basically this is why da Jews are actually kind of based and redpilled and not just malicious because whatever for no good reason and christianity is kind of like building towers instead of studying earthquakes and stuff first
generally eastern cultures don't do stuff just because they could and there are like 3 archetypes of the dumb white guys that have no idea wtf they're doing and lots of names for people who filled those roles
basically this is post enlightenment hellenism and it should be taught alongside english grammer in like 6th grade then they let people choose to stop going to school after that
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hellenistic_philosophy what is a hermitian operator What are people's opinions on Columbia University and how it became completely free of Jews which is something the redneck hicks who call themselves antisemitic could have done in their southern trump loving colleges but they didn't. Instead a university in Jew York pressured by liberals was the first to clear itself of Jews. Another beautiful day without using sin, cos or tan. Why is the IQ of college students today so much lower than it was in the past? Safety systems aren't designed against deliberate sabotage by the entire operating staff. So lets assume: a) The staff at a modern nuclear power plant want to create a catastrophe on purpose. b) They have unlimited time, access, and the means to demolish the containment structure.
What's the worst they could realistically do? Post op trannys are over 10x more like to commit suicide than pre-op trannys
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000001971.20#T1
>Although the overall proportion of those experiencing a psychiatric encounter was similar between the vaginoplasty and phalloplasty groups, suicide attempts were more common in the vaginoplasty group (4.4% vs. 1.7%, p=0.033). The rate of a psychiatric encounter occurring after surgery if an episode prior surgery occurred was 33.9% and 26.5% for the vaginoplasty and phalloplasty groups. Tell me why this isn't newsworthy. Is it as simple as something innate being capable of producing dimethyl sulphide other than us?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-13353023/aliens-K2-18b-distant-planet-emitting-gas.html What is "Cognitive Infrastructure"? Why is it controversial to say that human races have mental differences between them? It just doesn't make any sense. Yes, humans have a genetic bottleneck but humans have diverged since coming out of Africa that their physical features can be wildly different. We have the blacks, the pinks, the yellows, the abos. All look very different from each other physically.
There are differences in Race when it comes to medicine. White People are more prone to skin cancer than any other race due to a lack of melanin in their skin. Black people are at higher risks for high blood pressure, certain types of cancers and diabetes. Asians are at higher risks for liver disease than other races. Mixed race individuals are more likely to have these risks offset due to being biracial or multiracial but in some cases their risks of diseases prevalent in their heritage might be higher. Just like there are differences in biological sexes for treatment. Some humans like the Badjao or the Tibetans have evolved higher lung capacity compared to the average human.
So we have all these physical differences, affecting even diseases and medical treatment but somehow mentally we are all the same? That's kinda fishy no? I am not against vaccines in general, but after covid I started to question a lot things going on in the "scientific community". Good news everyone, it turns out that plants like CO2.
How come scientists never discovered this until recently?
Seems like it should be big news, but they never talk about it. Is there any scientific evidence the holocaust actually happened? How can you believe in evolution when it's only a theory (a guess)? Is this true about nuclear energy? Yet another major plagiarism scandal in STEM.
Why does this keep on happening? The official arbiter of scientific misinformation (appointed by the government controlled by the official Party of Science), Nina Jankowicz, says that the government must crack down on misinformation like sending pictures of empty egg cartons to women. That is “meant to remind [women] that [their] fertility is waning.” And that is “gendered misinformation.”
So there you have it. Couldn’t be any more official. Science now believes women stay at the same level of fertility throughout their lives.
Science is retarded and clownishly evil. Smash science. Kill science. i was just perusing nairaland and i noticed they like the same kind of memes that /sci/ does Bad news fellow vaxxies, the "turbo cancer" rumor that the conspiracy theorists have been yammering about has turned out to be completely true, as proved by this recent publication:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38234925/
>The "hallmarks of cancer" were proposed by Hanahan and Weinberg (2000) as a group of biological competencies that human cells attain as they progress from normalcy to neoplastic transformation. These competencies include self-sufficiency in proliferative signaling, insensitivity to growth-suppressive signals and immune surveillance, the ability to evade cell death, enabling replicative immortality, reprogramming energy metabolism, inducing angiogenesis, and activating tissue invasion and metastasis. Underlying these competencies are genome instability, which expedites their acquisition, and inflammation, which fosters their function(s). Additionally, cancer exhibits another dimension of complexity: a heterogeneous repertoire of infiltrating and resident host cells, secreted factors, and extracellular matrix, known as the tumor microenvironment, that through a dynamic and reciprocal relationship with cancer cells supports immortality, local invasion, and metastatic dissemination. EU finds that food products from India are all filled with carcinogenic chemicals, even products labeled "organic"
https://indianexpress.com/article/lifestyle/food-wine/ethylene-oxide-mdh-everest-indian-food-spices-cancer-risk-health-9289998/
How dangerous are the chemicals listed in the article? Is it possible to scientifically quantify the value of art by a standard other than the financial value of the artwork? Why is this taboo to discuss in the sciences? Consciousness is the product of some quantum effect >You have 2000 physicists at CERN and not one of them is famous because they haven't done anything original
How do you respond without sounding like a CERN physicist? With few exceptions academia wholeheartedly refuses to talk about this subject and racial supremacists aren't exactly objective. Obviously we can be diverse in physical size and appearance. I'm more interested in IQ and temperament which have been proven to be at least partly influenced by genes. >if you put your hand into a jellybean jar and pulled out one jelly bean, what are the chances it will be red?
>It's 50/50, either it's red or it's not
What is the best argument against this? Whats the scientific reason that people who are native to Europe aren't considered indigenous? Why are you convinced that your consciousness is just the end result of electrical activity in your brain? People 200 years ago were wrong about a ton of shit but somehow you understand the greatest mystery of all time because you read some books. How do I meaningfully wrap my head around the concept of spacetime? Like I kind of get it but I also don't really understand how time and space can be the same thing nor do I really understand time in a scientific way. I feel like it I understood it better I would understand reality better Are "nerds" not actually high IQ but rather just people who spend a high amount of time gaining knowledge in an attempt to compensate for their genetic inferiority? And then when they create technology it isn't usually for the betterment of mankind but a reflection of their bitter damaged egos? Is intelligence just an illusion and ultimately useless? Aren't all those people in Africa more evolutionarily advanced because they are able to reproduce more? What does this mean?
Human and chimp have more:
-cytosine (C)
-guanine (G), but this is less noticeable than C
than insects/spiders
However these arthropods have more thymine (T) and adenine (A) than humans or monkeys do
All DNA is made from these 4 letters
The numbers you see on a chart are percentages
Everything added together makes a 100. Serina Edition
Previous: >>16125002
We discuss research, DO NOT offer advice (just fucking go see your doctor), make fun of premeds and shitpost.
Keep vaccination/clamping/vitamin K/soliciting advice out of this thread and start your own because it takes a lot of space. Get a degree in business. Climb the corporate ladder or go into business for yourself. Also consider a job in government, or criminal justice. You don’t want to end up homeless do you anon?
>https://x.com/joedirt501/status/1783974688970125485 Do you ever think a godlike alien being is responsible for allowing causality(evolution/adaptability/etc) to produce such intelligent beings, AKA humans?
Could nature's one way cause-and-effect, or evolution, truly produce such intelligent beings as humans on its own?
Just how delicate and precious is life really? Obviously we have no way of going back in time or looking at life from beginning to end in its full totality. I think they are a great pain relieving method because they make you forget about everything else, even more so than watching videos/TV because you're somehow active in them even if it's a very slow paced strategy game but your concentration is destroyed for anything else. I have not found a better replacement to them and am wondering if there's really an alternative? This is purely scientific thread because it focuses on the way our brain works and probably the dopamine reward system that gets abused by video games. You can't just force someone with actually a damaged brain to just study and study, they will always relapse to video games and they wouldn't be able to play them sparingly because that's the only way the brain can manage to relieve the stress and perhaps the overwhelming amount of commands or resources to be focused. Soience now says basic hygiene is bad for you. Does anyone here trust this latest new soience? Does diversity make teams work better?
Apparently not!
A new, comprehensive preregistered meta-analysis found that, whether the diversity was demographic, cognitive, or occupational, its relationship with performance was near-zero. How the fuck does a body like this form naturally? How is this physically possible? >However, some excess cancer mortalities were observed in 2021 after mass vaccination with the first and second vaccine doses, and significant excess mortalities were observed for all cancers and some specific types of cancer after mass vaccination with the third dose in 2022.
https://www.cureus.com/articles/196275-increased-age-adjusted-cancer-mortality-after-the-third-mrna-lipid-nanoparticle-vaccine-dose-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-japan#!/
RIP Vaxxies
We tried to warn you. If there are an infinite number of whole numbers, and an infinite number of decimals in between any two whole numbers, and an infinite number of decimals in between any two decimals, does that mean that there are infinite infinities? And an infinite number of those infinities? And an infinite number of those infinities? And…(infinitely times. And that infinitely times. And that infinitely times. And…) … Where does the information found in things like DNA and RNA come from? How can it possibly come from any natural process? Is it safe to say that if I, a layman, come upon a study or information. It's probably BS? I have asked this multiple times and no one has ever given me a straight answer:
What astrophysical evidence would even possibly count as evidence that the universe is infinitely old? My understanding of the history of western thought is presuming the universe has/has no beginning is fundamentally a theological or metaphysical concern. No amount of finite evidence will ever confirm one over the other because the finite age can always be pushed back one layer of explanation so as to make sense with all of the observations made. What is the consensus on this dilemma in the theoretical physicist community? The way I see it is science simply has no say on whether the universe began to exist, unless scientists inject some metaphysical philosophy into their own theory. "The First Key of Basil Valentine" edition
Last thread: >>16117647
This thread exists to ask questions regarding careers associated to STEM.
>Discussion on academia-based career progression
>Discussion on penetrating industry from academia
>Or anything in relation to STEM employment or development within STEM academia!
Resources for protecting yourself from academic marxists:
>https://www.thefire.org/ (US)
>https://www.jccf.ca/ (Canada)
Information resource:
>https://sciencecareergeneral.neocities.org/
>*The Chad author is seeking additional input to diversify the content into containing all STEM fields. Said author regularly views these /scg/ threads.
No anons have answered your question? Perhaps try posting it here:
>https://academia.stackexchange.com/
An archive of all the previous editions of /scg/:
>https://warosu.org/sci/thread/15740454 "Up to 50% of patients with cannabis-related psychotic symptoms presenting to the ED requiring hospitalization will go on to develop schizophrenia. "
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.640222/full
"Cannabis is involved in approximately 50% of psychosis, schizophrenia, and schizophreniform psychosis cases"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3927252/
"In one recent study that followed nearly 2,000 teenagers as they became young adults, young people who smoked marijuana at least five times were twice as likely to have developed psychosis over the next 10 years as those who didn’t smoke pot."
"One of the best-known studies followed nearly 50,000 young Swedish soldiers for 15 years. Those who had smoked marijuana at least once were more than twice as likely to develop schizophrenia as those who had never smoked pot. The heaviest users (who said they used marijuana more than 50 times) were 6x as likely to develop schizophrenia as the nonsmokers."
https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/teens-who-smoke-pot-at-risk-for-later-schizophrenia-psychosis-201103071676
"1/5th of cases of schizophrenia among young males might be prevented by averting [Cannabis Use Disorder]"
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/psychological-medicine/article/association-between-cannabis-use-disorder-and-schizophrenia-stronger-in-young-males-than-in-females/E1F8F0E09C6541CB8529A326C3641A68
Daily weed use was associated with increased odds of psychotic disorder compared with never users, increasing to nearly 5x increased odds for daily use of high-potency types of cannabis. The PAFs calculated indicated that if high-potency cannabis were no longer available, 12% of cases of first-episode psychosis could be prevented across the 11 sites, rising to 30% in London and 50% in Amsterdam
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpsy/article/PIIS2215-0366(19)30048-3/fulltext https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQRANDJvFbs&ab_channel=ABCNews >NASA says atmospheric CO2 would have to go to over 3500ppm before it would make a noticeable difference in the climate
Whats the absorption limit of CO2, how does that work? Does anyone here know? Are environmental toxins the reason there is no one as smart as Euler alive today? What kinds of genes are currently being selected for in humanity? I notice that none of the educated professionals in their mid-30s around me have more than 1 child. From surveys, the more educated and higher income have less kids. The poorest and less educated have the most kids. Religious groups have a lot of kids, my neighbors growing up were some weird Christian sect and they had 11 kids. The most technologically advanced people, Japanese and South Koreans are having no kids and their population will collapse soon.
I'm evolutionary terms what's happening to the species? Are there any good physics discussion boards where the people who post actually know what's going on beyond undergrad?
Reddit is just schizo-posting and highschoolers/undergrads asking (often daunting) for advice
/sci/ is just schizo-posting an something-pilled posts by people without backgrounds in science trying to prove a post (atleast the people on /g/ actually talk about tech)
It's frustrating to have to filter through all the nonsense to find people who actually know what's going on, I'm hoping someone who does and can point me in the right direction sees this >hey goy, protein is bad for you
gee, thanks for the warming, soiyence Watch the earlier part of this video. The prominent theist in the 13th century is making ontological argument in favor of existence of god. See how it is similar to big bang theory.
In fact the more scary thing is that the kind of discussions 7th they had centuries ago is the same as the discussions we have today. science is prominent today but logically nothing has really progressed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWA12KbB4XA I'm autistic and NEET. I'm learning long division rn. Up next is fractions. Climate scientist Stephen Schneider of NOAA in the October 1989 issue of Discover magazine admitted that climate scientists intentionally mislead the public about global warming as a means of forwarding their political goals:
>Stephen Schneider of the National Center for Atmospheric Research described the scientists’ dilemma this way:
>“On the one hand, as scientists, we are ethically bound to the scientific method, in effect promising to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but—which means that we must include all the doubts, the caveats, the ifs, ands, and buts. On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well.
>And like most people we’d like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climatic change. To do that we need to get some broad-based support, to capture the public’s imagination. That, of course, entails getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. This ‘double ethical bind’ we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved by any formula. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest.” Look at this shit. How is science different from voodoo priests saying voodoo is proven true because another voodoo priest said so? Or a Wikipedia article saying something is true because Salon said it’s true and Salon said it’s true because Wikipedia said it’s true? (Someone initiated the circular reference and then it becomes self-perpetuating)
Science is in salvageable and scientists are net negative impact 105 iq assburgers thinking they’re much smarter than they really are. They also believe they’re at the end of history at any given moment, again because of midwitism. This allows them to justify any atrocity, and never consider any evidence outside their established narrative. Elon Musk now says that wikipedia is 100% fake and gay and that it's just a propaganda tool.
Why do so many people on /sci/ still source their information from there? Why read lies? Will Musk's announcement get them to change their bad habits? Why do scientists brazenly maintain this antiquated model of Earth's core? What happened to them? Did they publish their proof? something went wrong with the original thread, its says "Connection error." when you try to reply, so i'm starting a new version of >>16106991
Construction and validation of a scale for assessing critical social justice attitudes
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjop.13018
>DISCUSSION
>The studies also assessed how having critical social justice attitudes relates to well-being variables. Many authors have previously linked critical social justice attitudes to poorer mental well-being in their work implicitly, but have not studied them directly (e.g., Lukianoff & Haidt, 2018). In our samples (Study 1 and Study 2), having high CSJAS (critical social justice attitude scale) scores was linked to anxiety, depression, and a lack of happiness. However, Study 2 indicated that this lower level of mental well-being was mostly associated with being on the political left and not specifically with having a high CSJAS score. The association between lower mental health and supporting the political left is in line with what other studies have found prior to this one (Bernardi, 2021; Gimbrone et al., 2022).
tl;dr science has demonstrated conclusively that picrel is what you look like >Switch to a 90% meat and fat diet
>Suppliment with some fruit
>Literally every physical or mental problem I have dissappears within a week
>Lose 10 pounds a month every month of fat
So, at this point, it's beyond any reasonable doubt that the best possible diet for anyone is obviously a high meat diet. Now, the question becomes WHY is anyone still holding a different position? It's recently been proven that the carnivore diet can literally cure bipolar. What's the scientific reason why an obviously fraudulent research get published and was under suspicion for a decade but only recently get retracted?
>duplicated image patches
>811 citations btw
lmao, their whole field is so fake and gay that possibly thousands of "experts" read this paper and none of them bother to check. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34702284/
Background: Symptoms of primary HIV infection, including fever, rash, and headache, are nonspecific and are often described as flu-like. COVID-19 vaccination side effects, such as fever, which occur in up to 10% of people following COVID-19 vaccination, can make the diagnosis of acute HIV infection even more challenging.
Case presentation: A 26-year-old man presented with fever and headache following COVID-19 vaccination. The symptoms were initially thought to be vaccine side effects. A diagnostic workup was conducted due to persisting fever and headache > 72 h following vaccination, and he was diagnosed with Fiebig stage II acute HIV infection, 3 weeks after having unprotected anal intercourse with another man.
Conclusion: Thorough anamnesis is key to estimating the individual risk of primary HIV infection, in patients presenting with flu-like symptoms. Early diagnosis and initiation of antiretroviral therapy is associated with better prognosis and limits transmission of the disease. The mechanism by which the vax causes cancer has now been discovered Good news everyone, rice, which is possibly the world's most important agricultural crop, not only grows better under CO2 enhanced atmospheric conditions, it also becomes more disease resistant when atmospheric CO2 is increased.
>Effects of elevated CO2 on resistant and susceptible rice cultivar and its primary host, brown planthopper
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8076292/
>The elevated CO2 (eCO2) has positive response on plant growth and negative response on insect pests. As a contemplation, the feeding pattern of the brown plant hopper, Nilaparvata lugens Stål on susceptible and resistant rice cultivars and their growth rates exposed to eCO2 conditions were analyzed. The eCO2 treatment showed significant differences in percentage of emergence and rice biomass that were consistent across the rice cultivars, when compared to the ambient conditions. Similarly, increase in carbon and decrese in nitrogen ratio of leaves and alterations in defensive peroxidase enzyme levels were observed, but was non‐linear among the cultivars tested. Lower survivorship and nutritional indices of N. lugens were observed in conditions of eCO2 levels over ambient conditions. Results were nonlinear in manner. We conclude that the plant carbon accumulation increased due to eCO2, causing physiological changes that decreased nitrogen content. Similarly, eCO2 increased insect feeding, and did alter other variables such as their biology or reproduction. Bad news sneed oil bros, it turns out that sneed oils are extremely unhealthy and all the 'science' that blamed heart disease on animal fats was completely fake and was made up to fraudulently cast blame for the damage sneed oils do on animal fats I'm not racist but I can't wrap my brain around this argument. First off, how to we compare the similarity of populations? Just typical gene frequencies? Then how is it the case that two average representative individuals in two different populations are more similar to each other than that same average individual and a random other member of their own population? How come soience can't save him?
Is soience really that useless and impotent?
In 1971 Richard Nixon announced "the war on cancer" and since then trillions of dollars have been spent on 'research' and even with over half a century of study the issue and infinite resources available, soience still has no idea how to deal with cancer, why not? Uh oh darkies.... shiee
>In standard cosmology, the accelerated expansion of the universe is said to be caused by dark energy but is in fact due to the weakening forces of nature as it expands, not due to dark energy."
embarassing
https://phys.org/news/2024-03-universe-dark.html Why are "never events" so common in the medical practice? Are doctors a bunch of lackadaisical incompetent bunglers? How did the lockdowns cause such a phenomenon? Was it all the chinese food that got delivered? Cherry blossoms bloom in Tokyo, 15 days later than last year, 5 days later than average
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2024/03/29/japan/society/cherry-blossoms-bloom-tokyo/
Cherry blossoms finally burst into bloom in Tokyo on Friday after heavy rain in the morning, marking the latest blooming in over a decade.
The declaration of the blooming made by the Meteorological Agency came 15 days later than last year and five days later than in an average year. Private forecasters had also expected this year's bloom to come much earlier.
Friday’s blooming is the latest in Tokyo since 2012, when cherry blossoms were declared to have blossomed on March 31, according to the agency.
Cherry blossom forecasting is big business in Japan. As early as in January, companies start to issue forecasts for when cherry blossoms will first bloom and reach their peak.
The weather agency, which began forecasting the annual bloom in 1955, sets a government standard for observing cherry blossom trees. For consistency, the meteorological agency only uses data gathered from the Somei-Yoshino variety, which produces pale pink blossoms. Prove the Pythagorean theorem without using a circular argument.
That means no trigonometry, brainlets. Is Coca Cola really a healthier beverage than milk? Japan has made mRNA vaccines illegal, what does /sci/ think about this? Was it a good move? How could we research the paranormal without succumbing to the incessant yammering of crunchy Arizona milfs? If the phenomenon is erratic how can we set some concrete rules to base research off of? How did grifters manage to fool retards into believing glorified madlibs is actual artificial intelligence? you couldn't have accomplished what they did If 85% of the universe needs to be composed of dark matter for general relativity to work the way it does, isn't it simpler to conclude that general relativity simply doesn't work the way we think it does?
When you presume that the standard model is correct, and that dark matter is needed for it to work, you're way more likely to just point at the few bits of evidence for dark matter detection and ignore all the failed attempts to detect it.
You've already decided on the conclusion beforehand. The experiments and research don't matter. What causes dreams? Do hormonal urges affect dreams?
>She could have had a baby, but instead science gave her an abortion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzFFtBsl5ps Scientifically speaking, how would anthropomorphic canine species look IRL? Not skeptical. Just wondering.
In my eyes it proves these two things
>"something" is observing
>reality can change its laws based off that observation Title speaks for itself really, I’m about to graduate this next year in Mech Eng. and considering attending grad school. I was originally going to go for Mech Eng. but a friend is trying convince me to go for MSE instead and is really stressing that that it’ll be the future, especially after the turn of the decade.
Can I get /sci/‘s opinion? Who (please be specific with named individuals) are powerful enough to have this mass censored from Biology 101 classes? Is it true that far, far more animals die in order to produce vegan food than do to provide food for normal sane people? Has science ever bothered to count up the animals dead from all of the pest control operations that farms do? take that climate freaks
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/electric-cars-pollute-1850-times-more-than-fuel-based-vehicles-study-finds/
he said EV (el Vehicle) pollutes 1850 times more while driving 1000 miles than what happens if you drive 1000 miles with gasoline
tire wear was calculated into the equation
he noted that the tires of EVs, due to their added weight, will also emit more microplastics into the air
particle pollution from EVs can also increase the risk of health problems,
>including heart disease,
cough, lung disease and, in extreme cases, can even lead to hospitalization,
>cancer and suddendeath. Thoughts on blanchard typology, AGP and HSTS >6 month old Liam received 5 vaccines (Hep.B, DTaP, Polio, Rotavirus, Pneumococcal) died within hours of vaccination
Nice job, science, way to go pls explain how it goes to a((1-r^n)/(1-r)) is this good for the environment? Why are Swiss people indifferent to climate crisis? what will YOU do to fix this /sci/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7hK5_Rj--8 where did the lie that CO2 is bad for the planet come from? Was Dirac a pseud for making up his "delta function" instead of using functional analysis? I've just red on the Internet that a black hole's mass is concentrated in a point with no volume and infinite density.
It was then stated that the appearent black volume around it is the part past the singularity where light cant escape (it kinda makes sense)
What doesn't make sense to me is how matter gets so compressed that it loses its spacial dimension.
Before reading this i thought that a black hole was just made of something like atoms put side by side by forces stronger than the repulsions between different atoms's electrons, but following this idea the black hole should have a small but surely existent volume.
So why does matter lose its spacial dimensions? Give me evidence of something existing without a cause. My mom is white German and my father is italian, but I look pretty much 100% Greek and people have thought I look Arab even though I'm theoretically half white half slightly less white. Did my mother cheat with a sandnigger??? To make things even more confusing my older cousin looks fully white, and obviously she cannot have a different lineage? Any explanation on the meaning of this would be appreciated. How can it be that I look like I got all the Greek genes and she has all the white ones when I know it's supposed to be 50/50. ITT we expose lies of math
>Gabriel's horn has infinite surface area but finite volume
>Unit hypercube has volume = 1 in all dimensions but infinite surface area for higher dimensions
Clear violations of Stokes theorem, not that they give a shit. Can any med student tell me if my hypothesis is correct?
A fungus like jock itch, it would be like a grass.
Which grows on the skin.
If I use peroxyde water is like burning it.
But the fungus will grow again, like grass.
If I keep using peroxyde water every day, It will regrow, but lesser every time.
Eventually the skin regrows, and the fungus is simply expelled because the skin would have entirelly being replaced, like cutting a fungus area in a bannana.
This would explain why is so hard to get rid off?
Is my idea more or less on the right path? Define closed system, preferable in lame man's terms. Could someone explain to me how the second choice isn't the correct one? >blocks your path
what do? Previous thread: >>16109209
>what is /sqt/ for?
Questions regarding maths and science. Also homework.
>where do I go for advice?
>>>/sci/scg or >>>/adv/
>where do I go for other questions and requests?
>>>/wsr/ >>>/g/sqt >>>/diy/sqt etc.
>how do I post math symbols (Latex)?
rentry.org/sci-latex-v1
>a plain google search didn't return anything, is there anything else I should try before asking the question here?
scholar.google.com
>where can I search for proofs?
proofwiki.org
>where can I look up if the question has already been asked here?
warosu.org/sci
eientei.xyz/sci
>how do I optimize an image losslessly?
trimage.org
pnggauntlet.com
>how do I find the source of an image?
images.google.com
tineye.com
saucenao.com
iqdb.org
>where can I get:
>books?
libgen.rs
annas-archive.org
stitz-zeager.com
openstax.org
activecalculus.org
>articles?
sci-hub.st
>book recs?
sites.google.com/site/scienceandmathguide
4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki
math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivia/booklist.html
>online courses and lectures?
khanacademy.org
>charts?
imgur.com/a/pHfMGwE
imgur.com/a/ZZDVNk1
>tables, properties and material selection?
www.engineeringtoolbox.com
www.matweb.com
www.chemspider.com
Tips for asking questions here:
>avoid replying to yourself
>ask anonymously
>recheck the Latex before posting
>ignore shitpost replies
>avoid getting into arguments
>do not tell us where is it you came from
>do not mention how [other place] didn't answer your question so you're reposting it here
>if you need to ask for clarification fifteen times in a row, try to make the sequence easy to read through
>I'm not reading your handwriting
>I'm not flipping that sideways picture
>I'm not google translating your spanish
>don't ask to ask
>don't ask for a hint if you want a solution
>xyproblem.info Your mind creates reality. Even language warps everything. Physics change. You're living in a dream. If a ball on a plane travels 1 meter per second up and right at the same time then how long will it take for the ball to travel 1 meter? previous thread >>16072199
if you love stats, weird numbers and counterintutive science, this is your general. Because one of the things with statistics is that nothing ever seems to be what it tries to show you on a first glance or glimpse. Doesn't matter if you are a seasoned professional, NEET or some disgruntled grad student. All are welcome.
Some people may not like it if you try to make them do your homework, others won't care and will just help you. Let's discuss theories together, ask questions and try to meme a little about this field.
in the previous thread we discussed why Julia has promise but is not delivering. How some people still use Matlab but hate it.
So, grab your favorite statistical software, dust off your textbooks, and join me in this exciting journey through the world of /psg/ - Probability and Statistics General! Let's embark on this adventure together and unravel the mysteries of data one statistical concept at a time. All Lee cronin has done is make salad dressing with absurdly expensive robots. How can anybody actually enjoy math? I really don't get it. I tried watching the calculus series on the 3blue1brown youtube channel and I'm already bored out of my fucking mind by the 3rd video. Why would anyone want to dedicate even an hour of their time, much less their entire fucking life on this shit? >Last September, astronomers in Japan detected a series of objects in the Kuiper Belt – described by the BBC as a "doughnut shaped region of icy bodies" beyond the orbit of Neptune – that had unusually warped orbits around the Sun. Researchers Michael Brown and Konstantin Batygin, from the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in Pasadena, speculated that only a massive planet's gravitational pull could explain these "orbital anomalies", said Live Science.
>Then in February, scientists narrowed down the "likely hiding" place of the "elusive" planet after they "whittled away" 78% of the "hypothetical world's suspected orbital pathway", said Philip Plait in Scientific American.
https://theweek.com/science/the-hunt-for-planet-nine
>If things go at this rate, it might take about a decade [to find].
Quote from 4.5 years ago
https://youtu.be/pe83T9hISoY Is bromine the weirdest element?
>the only non-metallic element that is liquid in room temperature and pressure
>puts off tons of scary looking vapor
>toxic What are some facts and evidence that people here are unable to see? Why is this necessary?
It makes no sense that a conventional calculation of a transition probability gives you an infinite result. What craziness lead to it, a division by zero? It's already 2024 and no self driving cars? What's the holdup? Let's see who has the best cope
GO I want to buy some test cards to verify the capacity for sunglasses to block UVA, UVB, and UVC radiation. When I look online for test cards which have designated testing zones for each of these types of radiation, I find that I can only find cards which have testing zones for UVA and UVC (as pictured), and other, more expensive UVB-specific test cards.
What I want to know is whether it is practically possible for sunglasses which block UVA light to fail to block UVB light. As far as I can tell, the materials which typically are said to have this property are metallic pigments that are used in sunblock.
What methods do sunglass manufacturers use to block UV light, and how likely do you believe it is, given these methods, that sunglasses bought online might have the ability to block UVA but not UVB? What kind of problems do high-IQ geniuses have?
>inb4; none Today: common denominators holy BASED! How did Tesla even bros? >the human brain works off this algorithm http://www.searchingmagnified.com/?dn=robink93.net&pid=7PO868R62
>knew back in at least 2006 from playing Neverwinter Nights
>domain searchingmagnified.com wasn't registered until May 13th 2014
>Discord registered May 13th 2015 in effect to inquire information about knowledge of algorithm
>the first publicly available instance of the full algorithm I saved on archive.org on October 23rd 2017
>no information publicly available about how widespread the knowledge of the algorithm is and at what points if any it became widespread especially before October 23rd 2017
What went wrong? Did you know that we finally resolved the polytomy of Neoaves? >be a subject matter expert on electric propulsion at NASA
>walk away from your job
>claim to have invented some kind of electrostatic propulsion that may eventually flight a craft like a UFO
>ask for money
I don't know, maybe I'm wrong but this idea of an electrostatic field that should generate trust thanks to the asymmetry sounds to me like the story of the man who got inside a bucket and tried to lift himself by pulling the handle.
Here's the patent anyway:
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2020159603A2/en how do i brainwash myself to be able to control all my neurons consciously? Look at this sexy goddamn chad. Look at him. Props to youngblood here on heading south like a fine viral young stud, away from the vestige of the tranny and the liberal cuckoo heads. what's it like to be dead? Is this this big bounce/big crunch/cyclic model true? Does this imply we will live forever but in different ways? This is le… evolution?
I can't believe people have just arbitrarily lined up different fossilized animals in a row, always (no exceptions) with massive gaps, claim they turned into one another, and the vast majority of the general public accepts this garbage as science. What is the scientific explanation behind them always looking like this? If sex drive is tied to your hormones (testosterone,etc) then how do you explain asexual people who have the same hormones but no sexual thoughts whatsoever? if you want to colonize another planet, the colony needs to be able to produce its own medical practitioners, engineers, chemists, mathematicians, etc, in order to maintain a decent level of technology. however, you'll have far less resources and fewer people, so the education system will need to achieve much better results per student while operating on a much smaller scale (1000 students at any time is generous) and with fewer resources (the entire school shares one small library)
how do you do it? https://waterjournal.org/archives/demeo-summary-3/
https://waterjournal.org/uploads/vol10/demeo/WATER.2018.6.DeMeo.pdf
what the hell is happening here bros how is the water getting electrostatically charged and getting alkaline and showing a higher uv spectra by it just being in some box please someone explain the mechanism
i have made a diagram of the box the author used so, new gpt2 architecture chatbot has been shadowdropped and it's output is significally different from gpt4 in some cases. below is what happens when asked to prove riemann's hypothesis and the overall process is consistent between multiple regens (normal gpt4t proposes a meme solution). can some mathfag look if any of this makes any sense? sorry for broken formulas formatting, that's how gpt2 outputs them (i think you can paste them in latex formula viewer to see them properly):
The Riemann Zeta function, (\zeta(s)), is defined for (\text{Re}(s) > 1) by the absolutely convergent series:
[
\zeta(s) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^s}
]
and extended to the rest of the complex plane (except (s = 1)) via analytic continuation. The functional equation for (\zeta(s)) is central in its analysis:
[
\zeta(s) = 2^s \pi^{s-1} \sin\left(\frac{\pi s}{2}\right) \Gamma(1-s) \zeta(1-s)
]
The Riemann Hypothesis asserts that all non-trivial zeros of (\zeta(s)) lie on the critical line (\text{Re}(s) = \frac{1}{2}).