>>1373184
>We're 66% of NATO. They do not have bargaining power, here.
NATO isn't everything. It's just a coalition. Not everyone throws everything they've got into NATO.
You're right, there's no bargining. You try it and you'll end up fucked up. You won't be facing NATO. You'll be facing every country in europe, every country that each country holds a treaty with, then there's the 90% of the rest of the world you've fucked with and have just given them an excuse to hop on with everyone else and get theri pound of flesh. Now would be a good time to look into how many other countries you've supplied with a reason, and start adding up all their military strength. One you can withstand. All?

>The closest we've come to civil war was J6. Didn't happen. Certainly isn't going to happen over annexing countries that contribute nothing to the world.
Right now you're a lot closer to a civil war than you was then. You're far more fractured, each side demonising the other. I'm personally hoping the inbound economic struggles and being unable to afford food will give it the push it needs.

>Also, all of this crying about national sovereignty is stupid.
Very.

>The sooner we annex them, the better.
For who? You gotta consider what would be lost. People over there have been educated so they actually understand this. They wouldn't accept moving backwards to your systems. You couldn't handle goatherders, what makes you think you can handle a few dozen first world countries equipped similar or better? Plus everyone else that hops onto the action 'cause swinging now is gonna cause the most damage...

Back | Go to board

Board:

/news/

Thread:

Mexican President Guilty of Elder Abuse