>>1284516
>huge energy surplus by definition of the physics.
>By definition of the physics
Brainlet, you sound like a retard
Are you just guessing? It doesn't say that In the article, and I'm sure they would have mentioned it had that been the case.

You realize fusion isn't guaranteed energy gain, right? It's like any other physical process and efficiencies are a real thing

The last I heard was the only process that generates energy gain is using lasers and the superheated plasma/magnetic process like this could sustain fusion for longer but was extremely in inefficient use of energy and often resulted in large net energy loss

Oh wait, you are a retard, you retard, read this from the article:
>Soviet scientist Natan Yavlinsky designed the first tokamak in 1958, but no one has ever managed to create a reactor that is able to put out more energy than it takes in.
That's technically wrong, a laser style one generated a net gain a couple years ago, but these tokamaks are very inefficient

Back | Go to board

Board:

/news/

Thread:

The Power of the Sun