>>1736800
>Add the realism of command, ie. incomplete information on enemy/own positions and numbers, incomplete info on the state of the battle, troops getting lost, troops not following orders, confusion, chaos, Murphy's law and we can have a real tactical wargame.
I always thought a multiplayer game about commanding line infantry on massive battles would be cool. The players would be officers in the field, like Mount and Blade, leading from the front, while the soldiers would be bots. Coordination would be done with NPC messengers carrying written orders, that could get lost, delayed or captured. A player on each side would be the general, having to coordinate his officers with partial information. Of course the fun it's in dealing with the fog of war, things like third party VC would ruin it, so I don't think it's really feasible.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/vst/

Thread:

Dynamic Standoff Theory