>>15464409
>when wind turbines are superior
Nope
https://scitechdaily.com/wind-farms-cause-more-environmental-impact-than-previously-thought/
Lets look at other problems
>moving parts wear and tear
>fixed costs for manufacturing certain parts whereas 1 kW solar panels are getting cheaper by the day
>turns out to be worse for the environment than fucking coal fires:https://wellsvillesun.com/blog/2023/04/17/farmer-wind-turbine-fire-in-rural-western-new-york-caused-contamination-to-family-livestock-and-land/
Funny how hard it is to find articles talking about the massive pollution wind turbines can cause if anything little thing goes wrong on those massive contraptions
Wind energy is the midwit's green energy and the preferred choice for globohomo because it creates huge, towering constructs that are constantly visible and make you feel small. Gen III and Gen IV nuclear is the only true way forward

>>15466084
generating "up to 7 kWh" in an hour is not the same as producing 7 kW electric
Like I said though, it's the midwit's "renewable" option

Back | Go to board

Board:

/sci/

Thread:

how come everyone seems to fellate photovoltaics when wind turbines are superior?they generate more power on less space and they work both day and…

how come everyone seems to fellate photovoltaics when wind turbines are superior?
they generate more power on less space and they work both day and…