>>15463088
>there is a correlation between feeling stressed out about covid pre-infection and getting long covid post-infection
And? There's a correlation between drownings and nicholas cage films. So what?
>consider: by fear-mongering that covid causes brain damage, you are literally spreading long covid
And your citation supports that inference... where, exactly?
P(Infected|Attribute) = ~0.0169
P(Infected|NotAttribute) = ~0.0238
P(Not Infected|Attribute) = ~0.0172
P(Not Infected|NotAttribute) = ~0.9421
Where in there do you infer "believing covid did it is the cause"? Where's that data in what you linked? Go ahead tell me and I'll do the conditional probability.
>>15463245
>Well first we would want to see the rates of long covid by covid vaccination status.
How could the vaccine cause long covid when, for people who voluntarily get vaccinated, there's no temporal proximity to vaccination and any reported side effects? https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2784015
By cutting out the selection bias you can get a pretty clear answer as to so-called vaccine risk. That risk is virtually zero. But I'm sure you'll totally not pull spurious correlation after spurious correlation out your ass, and toootally won't discount temporal proximity designs for bogus reasons.
>That would eliminate an obvious potential cause of long covid: synthetic mRNA creating spike protein for an unknown duration in the body.
There is no mechanism for that and there's no temporal proximity indicating that. Why would you think it a potential cause?

Back | Go to board

Board:

/sci/

Thread:

why don't we have a treatment for long covid yet