>>15470049
Okay, Thrasymachus. Let's begin.

>all realities
I'll take just this one infinite universe, thanks. No need to graft extra fat onto the thought experiment (which is, besides, called "modal metaphysics").
>Establishing your basis
Little to argue for or against, here. Unless you want to argue about which terms apply to which areas of physical observation, which is generally useless.

>In which case, which version is our "true" self?
What is "true"? You are just juggling words, like a midwit. I don't care about "truthness" of self. I just care about what matters -- which is the one currently speaking.
That's an entirely different question, am I wrong?

>I am not less real just because there are right now infinite versions of me having gay sex this very second (or call it meta-second on the orthogonal meta-time axis). Although I don't actually accept this interpretation -- me having gay sex. Because I just accept the interpretation my precise life history is a "me". Everything else are almost the same twins.
So someone that currently wears a green shit is not me.
At this point we're arguing semantics, what words really mean. Let's leave that to the linguistics. I think we both understood what the other really meant. Let's not waste time with this.

>A bit strange, but okay. It's the most parsimonious interpretation.
The only argument you've made is that you think you are what you currently consider yourself to be. Reasonable, somewhat irrelevant, but you've shared no evidence for that claim. Why do you think that?

Back | Go to board

Board:

/sci/

Thread:

>Space is infinite therefore there is an exact replica of Earth out there and an exact replica of you out there. This is retarded. No there…

>Space is infinite therefore there is an exact replica of Earth out there and an exact replica of you out there.
This is retarded. No there…