>>1145902
>Given that crime is a net negative BUT based on the general morality of a population then crime doesn't even exist and is thus arbitrary and the question about who commits more crime cannot be answered because it's a moral issue.
This isn't even remotely resembling anything I've said. Either you're super bad faith or you're actually too dull to understand. I don't know how to explain it any simpler, anon. I'm sorry.

>If the question is which race is worse in regards to crime, we still have an answer based on evidence.
Black people commit more crime. This is a statistical reality. I've never said anything otherwise.

>You're interjecting a question of morality perhaps based on your equality-based morality.
I haven't made a single moral claim about race or any other topic in this whole conversation. You're strawmanning again.

>We could pull multiple metrics to compare races in many or all areas to find which is worse.
"Worse" is a moral judgement, which is completely arbitrary. One person could say "black people are the worst because they commit the most crime" and another person can say "black people are the worst because they have the most single mothers" and neither of you would be right or wrong because morality is completely subjective. Again, I cannot explain this any simpler.

>So, you're the one in the wrong here because you're grasping for an argument.
I've given my argument very plainly in two very easy to comprehend sentences and you haven't engaged with any of it either because you're unwilling or incapable. You can't explain why I'm wrong. You can't even accurately recite my own argument back to me.

>I just though your statement was hilarious.
Take an intro to ethics class sometime, anon. The confidence in which you speak about a subject you clearly know nothing about is pathetic.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/news/

Thread:

NYC agrees to pay $21.5K each to protesters trapped by NYPD during 2020 protest