>>1145273
>People should be open-minded about the evidence used in the Energy Department's assessment, according to virologist Angela Rasmussen. But she said that without evaluating the evidence contained in the classified report, there's no reason to challenge the conclusion that the virus spread naturally.
>“We can and do know what the scientific evidence shows,” Rasmussen tweeted Tuesday. “The available evidence still shows zoonotic emergence at Huanan market.”
>Many of those citing the report as proof, however, seemed uninterested in the evidence.
So the DE and FBI believe the evidence points to a lab leak, but because some other agencies believe differently, anyone who disagrees is uninterested in the evidence? I find this whole thing ironic, since they're talking about being open minded and then immediately take a close minded stance.

>They seized on the report and said it suggests the experts were wrong when it came to masks and vaccines, too.
>“School closures were a failed & catastrophic policy. Masks are ineffective. And harmful,” said a tweet that's been read nearly 300,000 times since Sunday. “COVID came from a lab. Everything we skeptics said was true.”
Well we did just get a Cochrane Review that was unable to declare any efficacy in masking, but I've seen people throwing a fit over that as well, yet we were all supposed to "trust the science" when a positive study about masks would be pushed.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/news/

Thread:

COVID-19 conspiracies soar after latest report on origins